Residents of Vista Ridge continue to press the Estes Park Housing Authority over concerns about the valuation of their property when they sell it due to the deed restriction that limit appreciation. The deed restrictions govern resale to people who have incomes at or below 80% of the area median income. The properties have a maximum resale price formula based on the original purchase price plus a share of appreciation. Credit: Estes Valley Voice

Concerns about the interpretation of deed restrictions governing affordable housing units at Vista Ridge were a central topic Wednesday morning as the Estes Park Housing Authority board discussed potential changes to its resale policies for deed-restricted homes.

Three Vista Ridge homeowners urged the board to address longstanding questions about how resale values are calculated before pursuing broader policy changes.

Annaka Hogelin, a Vista Ridge homeowner, asked the board to conduct a formal review of how the existing deed restriction is being interpreted, particularly the definition of “market value.”

“As I understand it, this review was in response to multiple Vista Ridge homeowners raising concerns, including through the Restorative Justice process, about how the existing deed restriction is being interpreted and applied,” Hogelin told the board.

Hogelin argued that before the board considers a new resale formula, it should first determine whether the current methodology accurately reflects the language contained in the recorded deed restriction.

Hogelin said homeowners have questioned whether appreciation can be effectively discounted twice under the current process, since appraisers already account for the deed restriction when determining value before the resale formula is applied.

Elaine Hunt Downey, who has owned a deed-restricted Vista Ridge condominium since 2004, said affordable homeowners first raised concerns nearly a year ago.

“In July of 2025, 86% of affordable homeowners signed and submitted a petition requesting that the housing authority use a true market value appraisal consistent with a common understanding of market value,” Hunt Downey said.

She noted that homeowners later participated in a restorative justice process with housing authority officials, but said the core question of market-value interpretation remains unresolved.

“Before considering alternative approaches or new proposals, we should first resolve the underlying question of how market value is being interpreted,” she said.

Hunt Downey also questioned whether any changes could be applied retroactively after homeowners purchased under a system in place for more than two decades and requested that homeowners be included in future discussions before any revisions are finalized.

A third Vista Ridge resident, Brenda Loveall, offered a brief statement asking the board to review the interpretation of the existing deed restriction before considering any replacement deed restriction language.

Executive Director Scott Moulton told the board that staff is not proposing changes to existing deed restrictions. Instead, staff recommended pursuing administrative clarifications to improve transparency and documentation, and exploring a new deed restriction template for future housing projects.

Moulton said the current Vista Ridge deed restriction has generally succeeded in preserving affordability while providing homeownership opportunities for income-qualified residents. Staff materials presented to the board state that Vista Ridge homes have appreciated at an average annual rate of approximately 1.55% while remaining affordable to future buyers.

Following the discussion, board members directed staff to move forward with administrative clarifications and to begin developing a prospective deed restriction model for future projects, such as the proposed Fish Hatchery project, which is not yet under construction.

The board’s action reflected recommendations that call for additional transparency, improved resale documentation, and the development of a modernized deed restriction template for future affordable housing developments.

Board vacancies create recruitment challenge

The board also learned that three members have resigned.

Chairman Eric Blackhurst announced that Marty Miranda would be leaving the board because of personal and family obligations. He also reported that Rut Miller, director of Estes Valley Investment in Childhood Services, and Julia Daley, a realtor with First Colorado Realty, had resigned due to personal and health-related reasons.

The departures leave the seven-member board with only four active members, the minimum needed to conduct business.

Board members discussed the challenge of filling the vacancies and noted that appointments are made by the Estes Park Town Board. The recruitment process is expected to include advertising the openings, accepting applications, conducting interviews, and vetting candidates through the town’s appointment process, a procedure expected to take several weeks.

SkyView move planned for August

Moulton updated the board on the housing authority’s planned relocation from its current offices into the SkyView event center building at Fall River Village.

The move is now expected to occur in mid-August as renovations continue. The authority is ordering new office furniture, replacing carpeting, performing electrical work, and undertaking some other modifications to the building for office use.

The housing authority purchased Fall River Village in 2024. It has converted the property’s short-term vacation rental units into workforce housing, and it plans to use the SkyView building for its administrative offices.

Castle Ridge property discussed during executive session

At the conclusion of the public meeting, the board entered executive session to discuss the Castle Ridge property.

The EPHA purchased and land-banked Castle Ridge in 2019. Initial plans were to build 28 to 30 ownership-style units in an effort to increase the number of attainable for-sale opportunities. The housing authority has previously indicated it may consider selling the proposed workforce housing project after construction cost estimates came in significantly higher than anticipated.

No public action regarding Castle Ridge was taken before the board entered executive session.

The board also voted to retain its July meeting after initially considering cancellation due to staff workload associated with a major software conversion and an office relocation. The next meeting is scheduled for July 22, followed by an August meeting on Aug. 19. Meetings are open to the public and begin at 8:30 a.m.